Is a defendant's claim that excluding the evidence in a civil case would have violated his constitutional rights?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Borys, C066530 (Cal. App. 2014):

Defendant's claim that excluding the evidence violated his constitutional rights is also unpersuasive. The court correctly applied the rules of evidence and the application of the ordinary rules of evidence does not generally infringe impermissibly on a defendant's constitutional rights. (People v. Boyette (2002) 29 Cal.4th 381, 427-428.) This case does not present an exception to this rule.

Other Questions


What is the test for a defendant's claim that the exclusion of evidence in the trial of a defendant in a sexual assault case violated his federal constitutional right to present a defense? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have any grounds to argue that the Court's recent rulings in a civil case against the Defendant violated the Defendant's civil rights? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a demurrer to deny or deny a plaintiff's civil rights claim against a civil servant who allegedly participated in civil rights violations? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a constitutional right to cross-examine the autopsy on the evidence that supports his claim that the autopsy doctor excluded him from the examination? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
Does a plaintiff's claim for equal rights under the Civil Rights Act apply to a defendant's claim of equal treatment? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's reliance on evidence code section 730 of the Evidence Code Section 730 a violation of his constitutional right to access a mental health expert? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court strike down a section of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits the use of certain types of civil rights, such as civil liberties, as well as those of the individual, in the context of civil liberties? (California, United States of America)
Does admitting into evidence of volunteered statements by a defendant prior to his having been advised of his rights under the Federal Constitution violate such rights? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue that admitting the evidence in a civil case would have violated his federal confrontation rights? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.