Is a defendant permitted to raise his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in his reply brief?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Lopez, C072072 (Cal. App. 2014):

Defendant has forfeited this claim on appeal. " '[A] defendant may not complain on appeal of prosecutorial misconduct unless in a timely fashion -- and on the same ground -- the defendant made an assignment of misconduct and requested that the jury be admonished to disregard the impropriety. [Citation.]' [Citation.]" (People v. Stanley (2006) 39 Cal.4th 913, 952, italics added.) At trial, defense counsel did not request an admonition to the jury when he objected to the prosecutor's argument, and he objected on grounds of improper rebuttal, not burden shifting. The argument is thus forfeited.

Defendant asserts for the first time in his reply brief that should we conclude his claim of prosecutorial misconduct is forfeited, we should review the matter for ineffective assistance of counsel. By failing to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in his opening brief, defendant has forfeited that contention as well. Arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief may be deemed forfeited absent a showing of good cause. (Garcia v. McCutchen (1997) 16 Cal.4th 469, 482, fn. 10.) Defendant makes no showing as to why he should be permitted to raise his claim for ineffective assistance of counsel in his reply brief. Accordingly, the claim is deemed forfeited.

Even were we to consider defendant's claim of prosecutorial misconduct on the merits, we would conclude the prosecutor committed no error. For purposes of prosecutorial misconduct, "[a] distinction clearly exists between the permissible comment that a defendant has not produced any evidence, and on the other hand an improper statement that a defendant has a duty or burden to produce evidence, or a duty or burden to prove his or her innocence." (People v. Bradford (1997) 15 Cal.4th 1229, 1340.) The latter constitutes prosecutorial misconduct, but the former does not. The prosecutor's comment was of the former; a comment on the lack of evidence providing a reason for why the victims would lie.

Other Questions


When a defendant fails to raise an issue in the opening brief, raising it for the first time in the reply brief, is a claim of ineffective assistance forfeited? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant ineffective in his ineffective assistance of counsel claim? (California, United States of America)
What is the record of the appellant's appeal against a finding that counsel provided ineffective assistance and ineffective assistance to counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant claim ineffective assistance of counsel by virtue of counsel's failure to object? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of ineffective assistance claims in the context of an ineffective assistance claim? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that his trial counsel's failure to object or request a limiting instruction was ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant bring a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel against counsel who failed to follow up with follow-up questions? (California, United States of America)
Is ineffective assistance to counsel ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have any grounds to claim ineffective assistance of counsel as a result of his trial counsel's failure to object to the prosecutor's statements? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.