Is a defendant entitled to withdraw his plea on the grounds that the court failed to advise him of the mandatory permanent revocation of his driver's license?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Miller, B231365 (Cal. App. 2012):

Defendant contends that his plea should be set aside, because the court failed to advise him of the mandatory permanent revocation of his driver's license. It is true that he was not so advised. However, as we have already explained with respect to attorney Short's failure to give such an advisement, it is not reasonably probable that if defendant had known of the revocation consequence, he would not have entered the plea. Therefore, he is not entitled to withdraw his plea on that ground. (People v. Dakin (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 1026, 1033-1034.)

Page 18

The judgment is affirmed.

Other Questions


Does Defendant have any grounds to argue that the Court's recent rulings in a civil case against the Defendant violated the Defendant's civil rights? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant withdraws his plea to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing and claims his court-appointed counsel was prejudicially ineffective, what is the test for withdrawing his plea? (California, United States of America)
What is the record of why defendant's trial counsel failed to object to the sentencing on the ground that the trial court improperly used defendant's religious beliefs as a basis for his sentence? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant withdraws his plea to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing and claims his court-appointed counsel was prejudicially ineffective, what is the test for withdrawing his plea? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a defendant's claim that counsel failed to object to the trial court's incorrect belief that he had expressed no remorse at his initial sentencing hearing? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have grounds to argue that a trial court prejudicially errs in failing to instruct the jury sua sponte at the penalty phase to disregard the no-sympathy instruction at the guilt phase? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant obtain a new trial on the grounds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion to deny the motion on the same grounds as the previous motion? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have any grounds to argue that the trial court erred in failing to give the cautionary instruction at the end of trial? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who failed to object to the trial court's decision to conduct voir dire in open court preserve the issue for appeal? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1018 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant makes a statement in open court that authorizes or adopts a motion to withdraw his plea? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.