The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Herrera, 977 F.2d 593 (9th Cir. 1992):
"An indigent defendant is entitled to appointed counsel, but not necessarily to appointed counsel of his choice." United States v. Torres-Rodriguez, 930 F.2d 1375, 1380 n. 2 (9th Cir.1991); see also United States v. Robinson, 967 F.2d 287, 294 (9th Cir.1992) (defendant failed to show that he had a right to specific appointed counsel or that present appointed counsel tainted his appeal).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.