Is a default judgment set aside under section 473.5 for abuse of power?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Lin v. Thompson, B283223 (Cal. App. 2019):
142 Cal.App.3d 891, 895.) We review the order setting aside the default judgment under section 473.5 for an abuse of discretion. (Bae, at p. 97; Sakaguchi v. Sakaguchi (2009) 173 Cal.App.4th 852, 862.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for abuse of abuse of power in the context of a motion to overturn a finding that the trial court abused power on the Pitchess motion? (California, United States of America)
Is there an abuse of authority or abuse of discretion in setting aside a default and judgment? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion to set aside a default judgment against a defendant be granted on the grounds that the judgment is void? (California, United States of America)
Can an order denying a motion to set aside a default be appealed from the default judgment? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of public power in the context of abuse of power? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of abuse of power under section 352 of the Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Is a default judgment for abuse of power enforceable? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to re-weigh the evidence to determine whether the trial court abused its power to grant an order for an abuse of power? (California, United States of America)
Can a motion to vacate and a default judgment under section 473 be reviewed for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of abuse of power under section 945.4? (California, United States of America)
