Is a cause of action sufficiently pleaded to stop the demolition of a building in a residential development?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Leppo v. City of Petaluma, 20 Cal.App.3d 711, 97 Cal.Rptr. 840 (Cal. App. 1971):
We have concluded that under the rule of construction and the applicable law set forth above, the cause of action was sufficiently pleaded. (See Solly v. City of Toledo, 7 Ohio St.2d 16, 218 N.E.2d 463.)
Appellants' next contention is that respondents should have sought an extraordinary writ to restrain the demolition.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion for judgment on the pleadings appropriate when the complaint fails to allege facts sufficient to state a cause of action? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring an inverse condemnation action against a governmental entity for damage caused to private property caused by a governmental action? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion for judgment on the pleadings appropriate when the complaint fails to allege facts sufficient to state a cause of action? (California, United States of America)
Is a cross-complaint pleading sufficient to constitute a cause of action? (California, United States of America)
What causes of action can a plaintiff bring in a common law cause of action for emotional distress and wrongful discharge? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for pleading not stating "facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action"? (California, United States of America)
When a pleading contains an allegation that is destructive to a cause of action, can the appellant omit it in later pleadings? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion for judgment on the pleadings appropriate when the complaint fails to allege facts sufficient to state a cause of action? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion for judgment on the pleadings appropriate when the complaint fails to allege facts sufficient to state a cause of action? (California, United States of America)
