What is the test for inference of negligence in cases involving rear-end collisions?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Bay v Woollard, 2019 BCSC 1073 (CanLII):

An inference of negligence is often drawn in cases involving rear-end collisions because, as stated in Wallman v. John Doe, 2014 BCSC 79 at para. 410:

Other Questions


In a collision involving a rear end driver of a semi-trailer truck, is there any inference of negligence against the rear-end driver? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are some cases involving rear end accidents and chronic pain syndrome? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for contributory negligence in cases involving young children? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for a civil jury application in a rear end collision involving pre-existing injuries as well as a subsequent accident? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts dealt with claims of negligence in cases involving scalding tea urn carriers? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for contributory negligence in cases involving infants? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts treated evidence in a rear-end collision case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are some cases involving collisions with wildlife? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a rear-end collision, does the following driver have any responsibility for causing the collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident case, can a driver of a rear-end collision discharge the onus of showing he was not negligent? (British Columbia, Canada)