Is an interim order necessary to preserve the status quo in a family law proceeding?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Elliott v. Pollock, 2015 BCSC 2121 (CanLII):

The primary purpose of interim orders in family law proceedings is to preserve the status quo: Kouznetsova v. Kouznetsov, 2014 BCCA 160 at para. 44.

Other Questions


Does the consent order of 1981 consent order on spousal support issue order apply to a nominal support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a party seeking to change the date on which to value family property or family debt under the Family Law Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court refuse to accept an offer to settle with the orders made in a family proceeding? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the submission of the Respondent on an interim order to order a primary parent to continue as the primary parent of the child pending trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal framework governing interim applications for an interim order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a numbered company to obtain an interim order to obtain a winding-up order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of an interim preservation order granted under section 9 of the BC Civil Forfeiture Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a joint guardianship order be ordered even if there is no cooperation necessary for joint custody? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a desk order pronounced on February 28, 2011 a dismissal of a request for a custody order and a support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Justice order a further review order to order that an expert in economic forecasting of the economic circumstances of a separated spouse be reviewed? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.