Interim consent orders that are made on a “without prejudice” basis are approached on a somewhat different basis than contested orders or consent orders that are not expressly without prejudice to the parties’ rights to take a different position at a later date. As Mr. Justice Pearlman explained in Sandhu v. Bhullar, 2016 BCSC 59:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.