Does a subsequent amendment to a regulation restrict coverage?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Grant v. British Columbia Pension Corporation, 2002 BCSC 586 (CanLII):
In Kovacs v. Insurance Corp. of British Columbia, (supra), Mr. Justice Meiklem found that with the purchase of a policy of insurance, an insured acquired the right to coverage which was then in force, and that those rights were not restricted by a subsequent amendment to a regulation which purported to restrict the coverage.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a strata plan be amended to allow for parking restrictions to be added to a parking lot? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a restriction on the use of certain types of medical equipment in medical malpractices constitute an unenforceable restriction? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are some of the most well-known examples of First Amendment arguments in the history of the First Amendment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does s.7(7) of the Statutory Regulation of the Law Society of B.C restrict the activities of the law society in establishing the conditions for issuing a practice certificate? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a restrictive covenant in an employment contract more restrictive than in a contract for sale and purchase of a business? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a covenant that restricts the use of land a restrictive covenant? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any need to amend or amend the pleadings of defendants in nuisance or trespass cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the definition of “comprehensive coverage” in the Insurance Regulation of B.C.? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Law Society of BC dealt with a case involving a lawyer’s attempt to avoid a restriction on his practice by concealing his non-compliance with the restriction? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the court treated a motorist’s protection claim in the context of an amendment to the Insurance Regulation? (British Columbia, Canada)
