What is the role of a reviewing court when applying the reasonableness standard?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Langille v Crime Victim Assistance Program, 2017 BCSC 2241 (CanLII):
The court must be careful not to reassess the relevant factors and substitute its view for that of the decision-maker. This is not the role of a reviewing court when applying the reasonableness standard: India v. Badesha, 2017 SCC 44 at paras. 39, 57, 63.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review applied by an appellate court in reviewing child support orders? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by an appellate court reviewing a decision of a trial judge concerning matters of custody and access? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review to apply in a judicial review? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current standard of review and the guidelines for applying that standard? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by the Court of Appeal in determining the apportionment of fault between a plaintiff and plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness standard of review in judicial review? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the standard of review apply to a review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal decision to which the decision was patently unreasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BCSC review the applicable standard of review apply to a point of law arising in interlocutory proceedings? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the reasonableness standard of review been applied? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a decision of the Court of Appeal Reviewable on the reasonableness standard? (British Columbia, Canada)
