Is a finding of oppression sufficient to award substantial indemnity costs?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Le Maitre Limited v. Segeren, 2009 CanLII 16300 (ON SC):

Turning to scale of costs, while substantial indemnity costs are not awarded except in special circumstances, as noted by Austin J. (as he then was) in Arthur v. Signum Communications Ltd. [1991] O.J. No. 86: "a finding of oppression, by definition, almost always provides some foundation for an award of costs above and beyond the party and party scale." It is not axiomatic that a finding of oppression results in a substantial indemnity award but it may form the basis for the exercise of discretion in that regard.

Other Questions


What is the typical ratio between substantial indemnity costs and partialemnity costs? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court award substantial indemnity costs on a motion to amend a statement of defence? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court award a substantial indemnity cost in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a plaintiff’s conduct sufficient to warrant substantial indemnity costs? (Ontario, Canada)
In a condominium corporation action, can the court award only partial indemnity costs or no costs to the successful party? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to a substantial indemnity and cost of costs for breach of trust and misrepresentation? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the grounds on which this court could find that the trial judge erred in exercising their discretion in awarding a costs award? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for awarding substantial indemnity costs? (Ontario, Canada)
Is it an error in principle to award substantial indemnity costs when a defendant has a meritorious defence? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the indemnity costs on a substantial indemnity scale? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.