In this case rule 49 is not engaged as no offers to settle were made. As a result, an offer cannot be relied upon to justify substantial indemnity costs. Absent an offer, McLachlin J. wrote in Young v. Young, 1993 CanLII 34 (SCC), [1993] 4 S.C.R. 3 at para. 251, “[s]olicitor-client costs are generally awarded only where there has been reprehensible, scandalous or outrageous conduct on the part of one of the parties.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.