In their submissions, both parties sought substantial indemnity costs. In Young v. Young, 1993 CanLII 34 (SCC),  4 S.C.R. 3, the court stated (at para. 260) that “Solicitor-client costs are generally awarded only where there has been reprehensible, scandalous or outrageous conduct on the part of one of the parties. Accordingly, the fact that an application has little merit is no basis for awarding solicitor-client costs . . . .” (emphasis added)
Get a full legal research memo!
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.