In what circumstances will the US Supreme Court strike down capital punishment statutes that allow juries to determine whether to grant the death penalty?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Cornejo, 16 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 737, 197 Cal.Rptr.3d 686, 2016 Daily Journal D.A.R. 635, 243 Cal.App.4th 1453 (Cal. App. 2016):

In Furman v. Georgia (1972) 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (per curiam ), the high court, in effect, invalidated capital punishment statutes that allowed sentencers to determine whether to impose death or LWOP without guided discretion, concluding that statutes permitting juries absolute discretion in making the capital sentencing determination resulted in the arbitrary and capricious imposition of the death penalty, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Sumner, supra, 483 U.S. at p. 70, 107 S.Ct. 2716.) Some states responded by making the death penalty mandatory, thereby obviating the need for sentencers to exercise discretion. (Id. at p. 71, 107 S.Ct. 2716.) For example, North Carolina responded by enacting a law that mandated the death penalty for all first degree murder convictions.

[197 Cal.Rptr.3d 730]

(Woodson, supra, 428 U.S. at p. 286, 96 S.Ct. 2978.)

Other Questions


In a penalty case, in what circumstances will the court allow the jury to instruct the jury on a defendant's failure to testify in the penalty phase? (California, United States of America)
In a death penalty case, in what circumstances will the jury award the death penalty? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court review the imposition of the death penalty in a death penalty case? (California, United States of America)
In a capital murder case, in what circumstances will the California Supreme Court order that a juror should not submit a questionnaire for the purpose of selecting a jury in capital murder cases? (California, United States of America)
In a motor vehicle accident case, in what circumstances will a jury consider whether there is an aggravating or mitigating circumstance in determining which of the two most serious penalties apply? (California, United States of America)
What factors are considered by the California Supreme Court in determining whether to grant a dependency order? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury at the penalty phase of a capital trial consider whether there is evidence in aggravation not placed before the jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a jury should consider a defendant's mental state as a mitigating factor in determining the penalty? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court should have instructed the jury that it could impose the death penalty only if it found beyond a reasonable doubt that death is appropriate? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury be misled by the unadorned instruction of the prosecutor and defense counsel that the jury has sole responsibility to determine whether death is appropriate in this case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.