California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Tapia, 25 Cal.App.4th 984, 30 Cal.Rptr.2d 851 (Cal. App. 1994):
Finally, even in the context of invited error, the trial judge, not defense counsel, has the duty to apply the correct law. The court's duty to apply the correct law in criminal cases can only be negated in those "special situations" in which defense counsel deliberately or expressly, as a matter of trial tactics, caused the error. (People v. Graham (1969) 71 Cal.2d 303, 318, 78 Cal.Rptr. 217, 455 P.2d 153.) "In the absence of a clear
Page 878
The dissent's passionate desire to affirm the convictions in the face of clear prejudicial constitutional error must remain unsatisfied.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.