In what circumstances will the prosecutor bring the subject of the death penalty before the jury?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Carrera, 261 Cal.Rptr. 348, 49 Cal.3d 291, 777 P.2d 121 (Cal. 1989):

21 In addition, defendant contends that the prosecutor again brought the subject of the death penalty before the jury by arguing that defendant tried to get members of his family to lie for him "[w]hen he realized his life [was] at stake...." We have recognized that where avoidance of a special circumstance or the death penalty was a possible motive for defendant's acts or testimony, the prosecutor may properly cross-examine and seek to impeach the defendant by establishing such a motive. (See People v. Allison (1989) 48 Cal.3d 879, 892, 258 Cal.Rptr. 208, 771 P.2d 1294.) This passing reference, in the midst of a lengthy discussion of the lack of credibility of defendant and his witnesses, seems unlikely to have affected the jury verdict in light of the express instructions later given the jury not to consider the subject of penalty in its deliberations on guilt.

Other Questions


In a death penalty case, in what circumstances will the jury award the death penalty? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury overturn a death penalty jury's finding that a robbery and burglary committed during the course of the crime be considered an independent aggravating factor? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's decision not to seek the death penalty in death penalty cases violate the federal or state constitution? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury award the death penalty during the penalty phase? (California, United States of America)
In a penalty case, in what circumstances will the court allow the jury to instruct the jury on a defendant's failure to testify in the penalty phase? (California, United States of America)
In a penalty trial, in what circumstances will the jury accept that the prosecutor's closing argument at the penalty phase was improper? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor makes an argument that the prosecutor was aware of the facts to the jury in a death penalty case, is it improper or improper? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's argument to the jury that society "cries out for the death penalty" mislead the jury? (California, United States of America)
In a death penalty case, in what circumstances will the defense counsel object to the prosecutor's remarks that the lack of mitigating evidence supports a death sentence? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court review the imposition of the death penalty in a death penalty case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.