California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Hudson v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty., 213 Cal.Rptr.3d 227, 7 Cal.App.5th 999 (Cal. App. 2017):
tolling of the limitations period in accordance with People v. Zamora (1976) 18 Cal.3d 538, 564565, fn. 26, 134 Cal.Rptr. 784, 557 P.2d 75 (Zamora ), which we discuss in more detail post . In other words, petitioner called the trial court's attention to a defect that allegedly "appear[ed] upon the face" of the indictment (Pen. Code, 1004 ), but not one that asked the trial court " to review the sufficiency of the indictment or information on the basis of
[213 Cal.Rptr.3d 237]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.