In what circumstances will an attorney be found to have injured a client by failing to notify the client that automatic development rights had expired?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Baltins v. James, 36 Cal.App.4th 1193, 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 896 (Cal. App. 1995):

In Foxborough, we addressed the issue of actual injury in a claim for transactional legal malpractice. (Foxborough v. Van Atta, supra, 26 Cal.App.4th at pp. 222-223, 31 Cal.Rptr.2d 525.) Unlike the circumstances in Niles, though, in Foxborough a determination of whether the attorney erred--and thus injured the client--was not contingent on the outcome of subsequent litigation. (Compare Niles, supra, 9 Cal.4th at pp. 248-249, 252-253, 258, 36 Cal.Rptr.2d 552, 885 P.2d 965, with Foxborough v. Van Atta, supra, 26 Cal.App.4th at pp. 222-223, 226-227, 31 Cal.Rptr.2d 525.)

In Foxborough, the plaintiff employed the attorney to secure, among other things, certain automatic development rights for property it purchased. (Foxborough v. Van Atta, supra, 26 Cal.App.4th at p. 222, 31 Cal.Rptr.2d 525.) Contrary to the plaintiff's expectations and desires, the automatic development rights expired. (Id. at pp. 222-223, 31 Cal.Rptr.2d 525.) As a result, the plaintiff had to resort to a more expensive and uncertain process to attempt the property's development. (Id. at pp. 223, 227, 31 Cal.Rptr.2d 525.) Soon after, the plaintiff sued the property's seller for not notifying it that the unrestricted development rights would expire; the plaintiff lost that suit four-and-a-half years later. (Id. at p. 223, 31 Cal.Rptr.2d 525.) The plaintiff contended that the attorney's alleged malpractice did not cause actual injury until the plaintiff lost its suit against the seller and failed to recoup its losses. (Id. at p. 225, 31 Cal.Rptr.2d 525.) We found that actual injury occurred when the automatic development rights expired, stating, "... when malpractice results in the loss of a right, remedy, or interest, or in the imposition of a liability, there has been actual injury regardless of whether future events may affect the permanency of the injury or the amount of monetary damages eventually incurred. [Citations.]" (Id. at p. 227, 31 Cal.Rptr.2d 525.)

Other Questions


Is a client's attorney required to repay all moneys laid out by the attorney to the attorney before the client can make a claim against the attorney? (California, United States of America)
Can an attorney who is sued for malpractice by a former client cross-complain for equitable indemnity against a successor attorney who has been hired to extricate the client from the condition created by the predecessor attorney? (California, United States of America)
Does a client have a right to privacy protection if they are identified as a client by their attorney? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have a valid case to argue that the only circumstances in aggravation listed in both the probation report and the sentencing memorandum submitted by the district attorney are the circumstances in which the sentence was imposed? (California, United States of America)
Does an attorney have a valid contract with a client where there is a pre-existing attorney-client relationship? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a prosecutor be found guilty of misconduct by failing to notify the jury of the improper definition of malice? (California, United States of America)
When an attorney's disregard for the client's interest is habitual, or is severe discipline imposed on an attorney who fails to render services? (California, United States of America)
Can an attorney who engaged in a conspiracy to procure an illegal abortion for his client assert attorney-client privilege? (California, United States of America)
Can a defense attorney be found incompetent if he fails to understand the available sentencing alternatives and pursue the most advantageous disposition for his client? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances have courts found that a husband has been found guilty of contempt and/or contempt by reason of failing to show cause? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.