In what circumstances will a defendant be denied a new trial under section 1538.5(p) of the Criminal Code?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Rodriguez, 1 Cal.5th 676, 206 Cal.Rptr.3d 588, 377 P.3d 832 (Cal. 2016):

section 1538.5(p). (Cf. People v. Arbuckle (1978) 22 Cal.3d 749, 757, fn. 5, 150 Cal.Rptr. 778, 587 P.2d 220 (Arbuckle ) [explaining that a defendant's reasonable expectation of having his sentence imposed, pursuant to bargain and guilty plea, by the

[1 Cal.5th 843]

judge who took his plea and ordered sentence reports should not be thwarted for mere administrative convenience].)

This is not to say that reviewing courts are now free to second-guess judgment calls that are better left to the trial courts. Trial courts have considerable discretion to administer their logistical affairs, and rightly so: lodged in trial courts is likely the contextual knowledge and motivation to deploy judicial resources effectively, and to learn over time. But to adequately protect a defendant's statutory right under section 1538.5(p), we hold that a trial court must take reasonable steps in good faith to ensure that the same judge who granted the previous suppression motion is assigned to hear the relitigated motion. Only if the trial court has done so may it make a finding of unavailability. And the trial court must make such a finding on the record, so appellate review proves meaningful. (See People v. Lewis (2006) 39 Cal.4th 970, 10631064, 47 Cal.Rptr.3d 467, 140 P.3d 775 ; cf. Still v. Pearson (1950) 96 Cal.App.2d 315, 318, 215 P.2d 87 [when a judge other than the one who presided at the trial proceeds to hear the motion for a new trial, it is the best practice, in the interests of certainty and convenience, to cause a record to be made reciting the fact of the inability or absence of the judge who presided at the trial].) Such a finding, unsupported by record evidence demonstrating the reasonable measures a trial court has taken to honor a defendant's section 1538.5(p) right, is an abuse of discretion.

Other Questions


Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1170(d)(1) of the California Criminal Code give the trial court authority to resent the sentence of a defendant pursuant to Section 1170 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defendant be denied a new trial under section 1538.5(p) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1305, subdivision (b) of the California Criminal Code, section 977 of the Criminal Code apply to a defendant's right to be present at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be punished under section 654(1) of the California Criminal Code for failing to comply with the requirements of Section 654 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be punished under section 654 of the California Criminal Code for failing to comply with the requirements of Section 654, subdivision (a) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 190.3 of the California Criminal Code allow the penalty phase jury to consider the "circumstances" of the crime within the meaning of section 190 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 654, subdivision (a) of the California Code of Criminal Procedure, section 654 of the Criminal Code, allow a defendant to be punished for more than one act? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who has been given a life sentence for an assault with intent to murder be convicted of the crime under section 12022(a) of the Penal Code section 120 22(b) and section 5.5 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.