In what circumstances will a court give an instruction that a mother was contributively negligent in a motor vehicle accident?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Wiese v. Rainville, 337 P.2d 561 (Cal. App. 1959):

In Miller v. Peters, 37 Cal.2d 89, 230 P.2d 803, a mother and son sought damages for injuries resulting from a collision of automobiles. Defendant therein pleaded contributory negligence as to the son (the driver) but did not plead such negligence as to the mother (the passenger). In that case, the court gave an instruction with reference to contributory negligence on the part of the mother. Judgment was not defendant. The evidence therein was sufficient to prove that both plaintiffs (mother and son) were contributively negligent. In reversing the judgment, it was held that the introduction of evidence by defendant to the effect that both plaintiffs were contributively negligent did not authorize the giving of an instruction indicating that the mother could also be contributively negligent.

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a defendant is liable for a motor vehicle accident under the California Vehicle Accident Act or the California Motor Vehicle Act? (California, United States of America)
Does the phrase "as a result of" in a motor vehicle accident apply to a section of the Motor Vehicle Accident Act? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring an action under the California Motor Vehicle Accident Prevention Act for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
Does section 3110 of the Ontario Motor Vehicle Code of Civil Procedure (Motor Vehicle Accident and Accident Benefits Act) apply to a mechanic's lien claimant? (California, United States of America)
In a motor vehicle accident case, in what circumstances will a plaintiff be able to argue that the instruction on unavoidable accident is incorrect? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated allegations of motor vehicle theft in the context of a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
Can the Court of Appeal overturn a finding of negligence and contributory negligence in a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
In a motor vehicle accident case, how have the courts interpreted the standard factor (a)-(b) and (b) instruction in determining the severity of the accident? (California, United States of America)
In a motor vehicle accident case, in what circumstances will a jury consider whether there is an aggravating or mitigating circumstance in determining which of the two most serious penalties apply? (California, United States of America)
Does the standard instruction in a motor vehicle accident (CALCRIM No. 3160) require a pinpoint instruction? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.