California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Deegan, 202 Cal.Rptr.3d 204, 247 Cal.App.4th 532 (Cal. App. 2016):
Second, while Oregon v. Ice involved a consecutive/concurrent sentencing scheme, its analysis supports the holdings in Cleveland and Solis and the
[247 Cal.App.4th 550]
dictum in Black I. We so conclude because both section 654
[202 Cal.Rptr.3d 218]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.