In reviewing a Miranda claim, what is the test for determining whether a statement was illegally obtained?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Pitcher, A144718 (Cal. App. 2017):
In reviewing appellant's Miranda claim, ". . .we accept the trial court's resolution of disputed facts and inferences, and its evaluations of credibility, if supported by substantial evidence. We independently determine from the undisputed facts and the facts properly found by the trial court whether the challenged statement was illegally obtained." (People v. Cunningham (2001) 25 Cal.4th 926, 992; see also People v. Thomas (2011) 51 Cal.4th 449, 476.)
c. Analysis
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
