In a personal injury action, can a plaintiff argue that a Respondent have fully met their duty to present the evidence sufficient to support the judgment?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Toal v. Tardif, G044594, Super. Ct. No. 06CC02050 (Cal. App. 2012):
4. In contrast, plaintiffs have fully met "their duty, as respondents, to point out the evidence they deem is sufficient to support the judgment." (Hadley v. Krepel (1985) 167 Ca1.App.3d 677, 685.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When the evidence is sufficient to sustain some but not all alleged damages, when the evidence does not support all of the damages, will the court reduce the judgment to the amount supported by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a plaintiff to bring a personal injury action under a statutory change in the law governing personal injury actions? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
When a personal representative is substituted as a party to a personal injury action, is the personal representative required to present a claim under section 709 of the California Motor Vehicle Act? (California, United States of America)
Is there sufficient evidence to support the jury's finding that there was sufficient evidence for a reversal of judgment? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury action brought by a woman who was injured in a collision involving a brick path and a tree in front of her house, is Respondent Respondent to the injury? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury action, can a plaintiff argue that his actions were not intentional? (California, United States of America)
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence that supports the argument that the evidence supports the proposition that there is no evidence supporting the claim? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury action, can plaintiff appeal against a jury's verdict for insufficient evidence? (California, United States of America)
