In a motion to quash service of a summons, what is the effect of the error in the trial court's ruling on the motion?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from E&R Encino Prop. v. Behdadnia, B224363, No. LC086043 (Cal. App. 2011):

2. Contrary to defendants' representations at oral argument, appellants' briefs did not address any claimed error in the trial court's ruling on defendants' motion to quash service of the summons. Since defendants did not address in their briefs on appeal any argument with supporting authority that there was a defect in service of summons, we treat it as waived and do not consider it. (McComber v. Wells (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 512, 522.)

Other Questions


In reviewing a motion to suppress evidence, what is the effect of the trial court's ruling on the motion? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where the trial court would have exercised its discretion not to award a motion for damages even if the trial judge was aware of the fact that the motion was being brought before the court? (California, United States of America)
In a motion to suppress a search and seizure, what is the effect of the trial court's ruling on the motion? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a court quash a motion to quash service of summons? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant obtain a new trial on the grounds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion to deny the motion on the same grounds as the previous motion? (California, United States of America)
Does the cumulative effect of a trial court's errors deprive plaintiff of a fair trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.