In a motion to appeal against the sentence of a convicted drug dealer who was convicted of possession of a Class A drug with intent to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine in his home, what are the challenges to his sentence?

Green raises three other challenges to his sentence, each of which we reject. First, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence that he possessed the methamphetamine found in his kitchen. We review the district court's factual findings for clear error, United States v. Uzelac, 921 F.2d 204, 205 (9th Cir.1990), and find none. Green apparently lived alone, so the court's inference that he possessed the drugs found in his home, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, is not clearly erroneous.