In a disciplinary hearing at San Quentin Prison, where an inmate is accused of committing a criminal offence, is he entitled to be asked questions by the disciplinary committee?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Clutchette v. Procunier, 497 F.2d 809 (9th Cir. 1974):

Under the disciplinary procedures utilized in San Quentin at the commencement of this lawsuit, however, inmates were not asked questions by the disciplinary committee. Instead, a prisoner was given standard Miranda warnings (but told that the right to counsel attached only when he was questioned by the district attorney) and then was given opportunity to explain his conduct. We agree with the district court's conclusion that the "opportunity to explain" was in actuality a subtle form of interrogation. In effect, the disciplinary committee presented the evidence against the prisoner and then said to him, "And what do you have to say about that?" The interrogative nature of the hearing, however, does not depend on an absence of other procedural protections, as the district court apparently concluded. (328 F.Supp. at 779 & n. 7.) A disciplinary hearing is inherently inquisitive. It is designed to induce revelation of all the facts, including the accused inmate's version of them. The prison disciplinary hearing forces the prisoner into a situation of "interrogative custody," and the prison authorities must safeguard the inmate's privilege against self-incrimination. Adequate protection is provided either by postponing disciplinary action until after criminal proceedings have been completed by the courts or by providing the accused inmate with an attorney and advising him of his right to silence pursuant to the requirements of Miranda v. Arizona, supra.23

[497 F.2d 824]

Other Questions


Is a prison assistant's failure to interview an inmate's witnesses for a disciplinary hearing a violation of the inmate's right to access their witnesses? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a minor criminal offence included in the criminal history of a defendant in the Criminal History of the Criminal Code? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a prisoner entitled to a claim for medical malpractice under section 1983 of the Criminal Code because of a difference in opinion between prison medical staff and prisoner medical staff? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the difference between a civil commitment hearing and a criminal commitment hearing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When counting criminal convictions for career offender purposes under section 4A1.2 of the Criminal Code, is the criminal conviction of a career offender included in the criminal record calculation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted Section 894 of the Criminal Code in the context of an allegation that a defendant committed a criminal offence by sealing currency and receiving stolen currency? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether there are two offences, one offence and one offence, under Section 304 of the Criminal Code? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a prisoner entitled to a right not to become an informant if asked to do so in the presence of other inmates? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can an accused who otherwise satisfies the requirements of the offence under s. 88(1) of the Criminal Code be excused from criminal liability where the possession of a weapon is necessary for defending himself? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does Section 1326(b) create a criminal offence separate from the criminal offence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.