Is impecuniosity a valid defence to a plea of failure to mitigate?

New Brunswick, Canada


The following excerpt is from Leland Walton & Sons Ltd. v. Hillspring Farms Ltd., 2007 NBCA 7 (CanLII):

As a general rule or principle, I accept that impecuniosity may be a valid defence to a plea of failure to mitigate. However, I have difficulty in accepting that the impecuniosity defence should be available in sale of goods cases involving acceptance of an anticipatory repudiation. My reasoning is not complicated. The law states that if the there is an anticipatory breach by the seller, the buyer has the option of sitting back and waiting until arrival of the promised delivery date and then suing for damages based on the difference between the contract price and the market price as of that date. Obviously, this option does not call for mitigation on the buyer’s part. Indeed, if the buyer lacks sufficient funds to go out and purchase replacement goods in a rising market, the buyer should refuse to accept the anticipatory breach. However, if the buyer elects to accept the repudiation the law says that he must mitigate his loss. Now if we accept that the failure to mitigate can be neutralized by a plea of impecuniosity, we are back to where we started. The buyer is able to accept the repudiation and sue for damages, calculated on the same basis as if the buyer had elected not to accept the anticipatory breach. If the buyer wants that result, the buyer should reject the anticipatory breach, insist on contractual performance and wait until the date of promised delivery before commencing an action for damages for breach of contract. In short, it makes no sense to accept the rule in Roper v. Johnson and then turn around and recognize the impecuniosity defence for purposes of negating the rule. Our buyer had the option of whether to accept the repudiation or not. If he truly lacked the funds necessary to mitigate in a rising market, he should have rejected the anticipatory breach and abstained from initiating a lawsuit for damages for breach of contract until the anticipated date of delivery had arrived.

Other Questions


What is the defence of self-defence? (New Brunswick, Canada)
When will a defence counsel ask the complainant a few general questions about their sex practices that involve the complainant's personal security or privacy? (New Brunswick, Canada)
If an expert says that the results leading to her ultimate opinion are not reproducible because the assessments are too subjective, without objective measure, is that opinion valid or reproducible? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for the defence of provocation in a sexual assault case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Can a failure of natural justice be cured at the appellate level? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for the defence of duress? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What are the elements of the common law defence of fair comment? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether there is a valid disability insurance claim? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Can damages be recoverable in respect of loss caused by impecuniosity? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for negligence in the conduct of a defence? (New Brunswick, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.