If evidence is admitted pursuant to a Miranda violation, is it harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Bailey, E053496 (Cal. App. 2012):

If evidence is admitted pursuant to a Miranda violation, we must examine whether the admission of the evidence was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. (People v. Bradford (2008) 169 Cal.App.4th 843, 854.) The prosecution presented evidence that (1) defendant's first name was written on the back of the checkbook; (2) defendant was in the car with the checkbook; and (3) defendant had one of the checks in his wallet, with his name on the check. The foregoing evidence provides

Page 10

Other Questions


Does the absence of lingering doubt from a recitation of evidence the defense offered in an attempt to raise reasonable doubt raise a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's error in admitting evidence of a defendant's inconsistent testimony in the prosecution's case in chief, rather than for impeachment purposes, be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
If a text message is admitted into evidence, is that harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is admitting an error in admitting a statement made by the Attorney General harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where the trial court admitted evidence of evidence from two separate police interviews in violation of the Miranda principles? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury interpret the instructions of a jury as permitting a conviction on a standard less than beyond beyond beyond the reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does a competent, unconflicted counsel who submitted on the evidence at the preliminary hearing, should have argued to the trial court that this evidence did not establish the lawful duty element beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is confrontation clause violation involving unconfronted, incriminating statements of an accomplice harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is confrontation clause violation involving unconfronted, incriminating statements of an accomplice harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does the error in admitting an offence be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.