If defendant waives his relevance and prejudice objection, does the court have any power to rule otherwise?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from The People v. Ariza, B215199, No. TA098215 (Cal. App. 2010):
Assuming defendant did not waive his relevance and prejudice objection, however, we review the trial court's evidentiary rulings for an abuse of discretion. (People v. Richardson (2008) 43 Cal.4th 959, 1001.) The trial court has broad discretion
Page 17
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to deny without prejudice a habeas corpus petition from a defendant who has not filed a petition in the proper lower court? (California, United States of America)
Does the denial of access to the courts by the Department of Justice to defend a civil case against a defendant who is not able to pay for a lawyer to represent him in court constitute a prima facie equal protection violation? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
Does defendant fail to show prejudice in a motion where the trial court failed to sustain his objection to a finding that the evidentiary error was prejudicial? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's claim that Defendant has "waived" a claim that the Defendant has failed to object to the victim's restitution award? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have found that Defendant Joiner did not waive his assumed constitutional right to be personally present at the remand hearing and that the court erred in conducting that hearing in his absence? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who failed to object to the trial court's decision to conduct voir dire in open court preserve the issue for appeal? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a defendant's claim that counsel failed to object to the trial court's incorrect belief that he had expressed no remorse at his initial sentencing hearing? (California, United States of America)
Is a claim for damages brought by defendant in a personal injury action brought by plaintiff against defendant in the Superior Court of Appeal against Defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
