If a proper initial study has been conducted, does the standard of review shift to a de novo review of whether an EIR was required?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Grand Petroleum, Inc. v. Cnty. of Fresno, F078035 (Cal. App. 2019):

If a proper initial study has been conducted, the standard of review shifts to a de novo review of whether an EIR was required. Thus, in reviewing the final decision to issue a negative declaration, or mitigated negative declaration, we apply the " 'fair argument' test," asking whether the record shows substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that a proposed project may have significant effect on the environment. (City of Redlands v. County of San Bernardino (2002) 96 Cal.App.4th 398, 405.) "If such evidence exists, the court must set aside the agency's decision to adopt a negative declaration as an abuse of discretion in failing to proceed in a manner as required by law." (Ibid.)

Page 13

Other Questions


What is the test for establishing a new standard of review in determining whether a trust has been properly established? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard standard of review in determining whether an arsonist's intent to set fire to a structure or property is sufficient to constitute an arson? (California, United States of America)
On appeal, can the court conduct an independent review of the transcript of the in camera hearing and the records reviewed by the trial court to determine whether any records were improperly withheld? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a judge to determine whether or not to grant a motion for judicial review of a motion requiring a judicial review? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, what is the standard of review required by the California Court of Appeal to determine whether the evidence is sufficient? (California, United States of America)
What is the proper standard of review under section 1281.2(c) of the Statutory Review Act? (California, United States of America)
What standard of conduct will qualify as harmless where the facts support the standard standard? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether a witness was properly found unavailable, how does the court review the development of the historical facts under the substantial evidence standard? (California, United States of America)
Does a new standard of review apply when determining whether the jury instructions were proper? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a section 654 challenge, what standard of review does the court apply in reviewing the challenge? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.