California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Aikin, 19 Cal.App.3d 685, 97 Cal.Rptr. 251 (Cal. App. 1971):
The third instruction in this category was prepared by defendant and based on an instruction recommended in People v. Conley, 64 Cal.2d 310, [19 Cal.App.3d 701] 324--326, 49 Cal.Rptr. 815, 411 P.2d 911, footnote 4. It also was requested by defendant and told the jurors, in part, in substance: If you find that defendant killed while conscious, with malice, you will return a verdict of murder; (see later comment for apparent trial court omission here) if you find that defendant's capacity was so diminished that 'you have a reasonable doubt whether defendant premeditated * * * you will find defendant guilty of murder in the second degree.' This instruction, of course, suggests in a way that first degree murder was a potential finding available to the trier of fact if not eliminated by diminished capacity. 14
Page 263
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.