How have identification requirements been interpreted in the context of extradition proceedings?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from United States of America v Sandhu, 2021 BCSC 116 (CanLII):
In Danielson v. United States of America, 2008 BCCA 519 at paras. 24–25 [Danielson], the court discussed the identification requirements in the extradition context as follows:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts interpreted contracts in the context of the interpretation of contracts? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for constitutional interpretation in the context of "interpretation"? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for interpreting ss. 32 and 33 of the Charter in the extradition context? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for a court to interpret the interpretation of the House of Commons Bill of Representatives in the context of cross-party legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that the doctrine of common law must be interpreted in the context of the common law context? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a class proceeding be the basis for a legal proceeding if the claims presented in that proceeding cannot be sustained individually? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the requirements of procedural fairness in the context of club disciplinary proceedings? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can ICBC argue that s. 91 of the Insurance Code of Canada Act, s.91(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, or s.92 of the Act, be interpreted in the context of statutory interpretation? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the rule of common law in the context of personal injury cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the BC government's policy of not funding interpretation services for deaf patients been interpreted in conjunction with receipt of medical care? (British Columbia, Canada)
