I find that the wife was under no obligation to reduce the mortgage on the matrimonial home without some reasonable expectation of receiving something in return. She was under no obligation – contractual, statutory or otherwise to provide the funds to reduce the mortgage on a home registered to the husband. Accordingly, there is an absence of juristic reason for the enrichment. (See: Peter v. Beblow, supra, at para. 91.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.