Does a judge make a palpable and overriding error of fact when exercising costs in a personal injury case?
New Brunswick, Canada
The following excerpt is from LeBlanc v. LeBlanc, 2013 NBCA 22 (CanLII):
Lastly, in my opinion, the judge did not make any palpable and overriding error of fact when exercising her discretion with regard to costs (see Flieger v. Adams, 2012 NBCA 39, 387 N.B.R. (2d) 322, at paras. 21 to 24). IV. Disposition
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for appeal against a finding that a judge committed a “palpable and overriding error” on the basis of error? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for damages in a personal injury case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the law of conflicts of interest for a solicitor in a personal injury case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the burden of mitigation in a personal injury case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for “palpable and overriding error”? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the standard of damages for personal injury in a motor vehicle accident case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for making an advance payment in a personal injury case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the impact of a retroactive award in a personal injury case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for general damages in personal injury cases? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What are the costs of a personal injury claim? (New Brunswick, Canada)
