What is the difference between expert evidence for which notice is required to be given?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Luedecke v. Hillman, 2010 BCSC 1538 (CanLII):
He quoted from Stainer v. ICBC, supra, at paragraphs 16 to 18 as follows, to describe the distinction between expert evidence for which notice was required to be given and expert evidence which required no notice:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a plaintiff required to lead expert evidence to overcome a no evidence motion? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a medical malpractice case, is expert evidence required to assist the trier of fact's comprehension of technical considerations outside of scope of ordinary knowledge or experience? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of professional competence required to produce expert evidence in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for requiring expert evidence to prove deficient work? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a no evidence motion where a real estate agent defendant argued that there was no expert evidence sufficient to establish a standard of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between "new evidence" and “new evidence” at trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of expert evidence required for PDGV's work? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between reasonable notice and reasonable working notice? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a no evidence motion and an insufficient evidence motion? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the principles that will govern the court's approach to assessing evidence where there are significantly different versions of the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
