Counsel for ICBC submits that unless it is clear that cross-examination cannot substantially affect the acknowledged or plainly uncontroverted facts, a disposition under Rule 18A is inappropriate. He relies on Colosimo v. Geraci, 2004 BCSC 636, for that submission. There, the court dismissed a Rule 18A application as unsuited for disposition under the rule because the matter was complex enough that a summary trial would probably not result in significant time and costs savings. In fact, the judge estimated that the Rule 18A application was, itself, likely to take three days.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.