Does the learned trial judge apply the contra proferentem rule?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from I.C.B.C. v. Namislo, 2005 BCSC 721 (CanLII):

I am satisfied the learned trial judge did not apply the contra proferentem rule (see: Goodwin v. Insurance Corp. of British Columbia, [1993] B.C.J. No. 1794 (S.C.)).

Other Questions


How has the usual rule been applied by a judge in the trial court? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a trial judge's failure to give reasons sufficient to determine that the trial judge erred in appreciation of a relevant issue or application of the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a learned trial judge reverse his previous ruling that a statement was voluntary? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a chambers judge proceed under Rule 18A of the Rules of Civil Procedure in a summary trial where there are conflicting evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a learned trial judge's reasoning apply when the action of the landlord in terminating the lease was lawful? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of Rule 37B of the BC Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure on Rule 37 B of the Rules of Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of Rule 30 of the Rule 40A of the Rules of Civil Procedure on an application for a medical examination that comes three weeks before trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a chambers judge proceed under Rule 18A of the Rules of Civil Procedure in a summary trial where there is a conflict in the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court allow a chambers judge to proceed with a summary trial under Rule 18A of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a summary trial judge make a finding that a matter is not suitable for disposition by way of summary trial during the hearing of the summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.