Does the doctrine of abuse of process have any specific requirements?

Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada


The following excerpt is from Labrador-Island Link Limited Partnership v. General Cable Company, 2019 NLSC 6 (CanLII):

I also accept from Behn v. Moulton Contracting Ltd., 2013 SCC 26, that because fairness is key, the doctrine of abuse of process is unencumbered by specific requirements.

Other Questions


Does the failure to cross-examine a witness on a specific issue tend to support an inference that the opposing party accepts the witness’ evidence on that specific issue? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Does the unconscionability doctrine require a resulting improvident bargain? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the thin skull doctrine and crumbling skull doctrine? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What are the grounds that this application is an abuse of process? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the effect of the common law requirement for corroboration on a witness? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Can an employer be vicariously liable for sexual abuse? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Is there any evidence that counsel ever discussed a bifurcated process? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Can a garage that passed a car be held liable for repairs required to the car after the purchase? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Is a publicly traded company required to disclose material information or changes? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the law in Canada on equitable treatment in the assessment process? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.