Is there any case law where a plaintiff has called evidence?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Ullah v. Hertz Young Motors (1971) Ltd, 2015 AHRC 17 (CanLII):
I also accept the analytical approach advocated in Peel Law Association v. Pieters, supra, that once the respondent has called evidence, it is appropriate to assess all of the evidence on the balance of probabilities:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a motor vehicle accident case, in what circumstances will a plaintiff not be liable for failing to warn the driver of the vehicle that there is no evidence that such warnings would have prevented the accident? (Alberta, Canada)
Is evidence of a statement made to a witness by a person who was not himself called as a witness admissible? (Alberta, Canada)
What constitutes “non-expert opinion evidence” in identification evidence at trial? (Alberta, Canada)
What are a number of cases that support the argument that objection to admissibility of evidence is to be made at the time the evidence is tendered? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a Plaintiff withdraw a portion of an examination for discovery after it has been put in evidence? (Alberta, Canada)
Is new evidence submitted as fresh evidence admissible at trial? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a finder of fact not compelled to discount the evidence of a witness on a point when an opposing witness has not been confronted and challenged with the contrary version of the evidence? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for calling independent evidence in a sexual assault case? (Alberta, Canada)
When can a witness give evidence that is not in evidence at trial? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for calling medical evidence in a spousal support claim? (Alberta, Canada)
