The case fits squarely within the parameters set out in Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, [2014] 1 SCR 87, in that the facts are undisputed, the law is clear and may be applied to those facts and this motion is a proportionate, expeditious and less expensive process to deal with the outstanding issues than a trial. 2. Did the Plaintiffs have Proprietary Rights in Economical as Mutual Policyholders?
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.