How will the court consider the evidence submitted with an anti-SLAPP motion?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Turnbull v. Oro Grande Sch. Dist., E068794 (Cal. App. 2019):
fn. 2 [explaining courts consider the defendant's evidence submitted with an anti-SLAPP motion only "to the extent it defeats as a matter of law the evidence submitted by" the plaintiff].) This is because the focus at the first step of the anti-SLAPP analysis is on "what is plednot what is proven." (Comstock v. Aber (2012) 212 Cal.App.4th 931, 942.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the Court consider whether there is sufficient evidence to support a motion to dismiss an application for relief from the Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
On a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of California for a change of venue, does the Court have any jurisdiction or authority to hear the motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for approval of a motion by the California Supreme Court on a motion to approve a motion for approval by the Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of a motion to amend a motion in the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion by a defendant who alleges that the motion was improperly adjourned? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have authority to exclude evidence where a defendant has been found to be contrary to the evidence code under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a motion to suppress evidence, does the court have to accept the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does a competent, unconflicted counsel who submitted on the evidence at the preliminary hearing, should have argued to the trial court that this evidence did not establish the lawful duty element beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for summary adjudication on a motion to exclude evidence as to drainage, does plaintiff need to explain to the arbitrator why it was necessary to exclude the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law supporting a motion for relief from default where the trial court refused to allow the appellant to present any evidence to refute the motion? (California, United States of America)
