How will the 9th Circuit review a decision to exclude testimony?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Anderson v. San Diego County Dept. of Public Works, 990 F.2d 1255 (9th Cir. 1993):
We review for abuse of discretion the district court's decision to exclude testimony, and will not reverse a judgment unless an erroneous evidentiary ruling caused actual prejudice. Price v. Seydel, 961 F.2d 1470, 1474 (9th Cir.1992).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the 9th Circuit review a district court's decision to admit or exclude expert testimony? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a hearing officer disagrees with a decision made by the reviewing officer on the issues with which he disagreed with the hearing officer, how will the review officer's decision be considered? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
For the purposes of denying a motion for judicial review of a decision by the Board of Arbitration for Justice denying an application to review the denial of the motion, in what circumstances will the motion be reviewed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in this circuit of the 9th Circuit when a trustee of an employee benefit plan makes an "arbitrary, capricious" and "arrogant" decision? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How will a court review a trial court's decision to exclude testimony from a witness? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a reconsideration decision not to be reviewed during a judicial review of an initial decision? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
In reviewing the application of a sophisticated means enhancement, what is the difference between a de novo review and a clear error review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a decision to grant or deny interim reinstatement of a terminated employee have to be reviewed for review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a decision maker such as the Immigration Officer on an application for permanent residents in Canada be reviewed on a higher standard of review of patent unreasonableness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is a petitioner who has procedurally defaulted by not raising a claim on direct review or collateral review barred from raising it on collateral review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
