California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Randel, A132185 (Cal. App. 2012):
A court may consider a defendant's perjury in meting out a sentence. "A trial court's conclusion that a defendant has committed perjury may be considered as one fact to be considered in fixing punishment as it bears on the defendant's character and prospects for rehabilitation." (People v. Redmond (1981) 29 Cal.3d 904, 913.) "The commission of perjury is of obvious relevance in this regard, because it reflects on a defendant's criminal history, on [the defendant's] willingness to accept the commands of
Page 7
the law and the authority of the court, and on [the defendant's] character in general." (United States v. Dunnigan (1993) 507 U.S. 87, 94 (Dunnigan); see also Cal. Rules of Court, rule 4.421(a)(6).)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.