California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Khmer Buddhist Ass'n v. Phan, B272212 (Cal. App. 2018):
The trial court's factual findings made after trial are reviewed for substantial evidence. Under this standard, we should not substitute our judgment for the trial court's express or implied findings supported by substantial evidence. (People ex rel. Dept. of Corporations v. SpeeDee Oil Change Systems, Inc. (1999) 20 Cal.4th 1135, 1143.) Our review begins and ends with the determination as to whether, on the entire record, there is substantial evidence, contradicted or uncontradicted, that will support the court's factual determinations. (Ermoian v. Desert Hospital (2007) 152 Cal.App.4th 475, 501.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.