How is an enhancement review reviewed?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Montoya, C082283 (Cal. App. 2019):
sufficiency of the evidence to support an enhancement is reviewed using the same standard applied to a conviction. (People v. Wilson, supra, 44 Cal.4th at p. 806.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In reviewing a section 654 challenge, what standard of review does the court apply in reviewing the challenge? (California, United States of America)
Does a peer review proceeding conducted by a private, not a public, private, institution need to be reviewed by a public body? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Criminal Code require a domestic violence enhancement or a great bodily injury enhancement? (California, United States of America)
What is the applicable standard of review for an application of the independent review test? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant denied equal protection because he has not received either intercase proportionality review or appropriate intracase review? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for reviewing state law errors at the guilt phase of a trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a jury trial on a charge of reckless driving enhancement? (California, United States of America)
On appeal, what is the standard of review in the context of a motion for summary review of the facts of the case? (California, United States of America)
Can a lesser firearm enhancement be imposed in lieu of a greater firearm enhancement? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a ruling on a motion to exclude evidence, how do we review the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
