How have the principles of habeas corpus been interpreted in federal and state courts?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Boothe v. Superintendent, Woodbourne Correctional Facility, 656 F.2d 27 (2nd Cir. 1981):

Twitty v. Smith, 614 F.2d 325, 331 (2d Cir. 1979). These principles are designed to "ensure that the federal courts not intrude upon state proceedings unless and until the state courts have been given a fair opportunity to consider and act upon the claims on which the habeas corpus petition is based." Id. They have no less applicability when the claim is not one explicitly asserted by the prisoner but is seen by the federal court as implicit.

Other Questions


Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a state court's interpretation of state law bind a federal court sitting in habeas corpus? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal court grant habeas corpus relief for alleged errors in the interpretation or application of state sentencing laws by either a state trial or appellate court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a state prisoner obtain federal habeas relief against a state court's finding that the state court was wrong? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal court grant habeas corpus relief for alleged errors in the interpretation or application of sentencing laws by a state court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a state's interpretation of state law bind a federal court sitting in habeas corpus? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a federal district court to determine whether a state court or federal court has jurisdiction to rule on a federal Railroad Commission case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas proceeding concerning a state prisoner, is a federal court required to presume that a state court's factual findings are correct? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a federal habeas court have to defer to a state court's construction of state law rather than federal law? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a federal habeas corpus judge finds that a state criminal court violated the Fourth Amendment, what are the implications for the federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.