How have the facts in appellant's third amended complaint been interpreted by the Court of Appeal?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Reichelt v. Slotnick, B215506, Ct.No. EC046849. (Cal. App. 2010):
We note at the outset that in the proceedings at the trial court and in his appeal, appellant is in propria persona. Because this case comes to us on a demurrer for failure to state a cause of action, we accept as true the well-pleaded allegations in appellant's third amended complaint. (Evans v. City of Berkeley (2006) 38 Cal.4th 1, 5.) The following factual summary is taken from appellant's third amended complaint.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a plaintiff have to amend his second amended complaint to a third amended complaint? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellate court amend an order of the Superior Court of Appeal in cases not before the court? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have to continue to hear an appeal from an appellant who, as a result of the July 19, 2016 order rendered this appeal moot? (California, United States of America)
How will the Court of Appeal interpret the implied findings of fact made by a trial court in support of an order? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does a denial of a motion for reconsideration by the appellate court of the Superior Court of Appeal affect the appealability of the denial of the motion to reconsideration? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
Is an appeal moot when, through no fault of the appellant, an event occurs which makes it impossible for the reviewing court to provide any effective relief to the appellant even when ruling in the appellant's favor? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a third amended complaint and a fourth amended complaint? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
