How have the courts treated the findings of misrepresentation and coercion?

California, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Pongputmong v. City of Santa Monica, 15 Cal.App.4th 99, 18 Cal.Rptr.2d 550 (Cal. App. 1993):

Appellant next claims in essence that the findings of misrepresentation and coercion made by respondents are not supported by the record. However, the amended writ petition filed in superior court claimed only that the conversion applications be deemed approved as a matter of law because of inaction by respondents. It did not challenge respondents' findings of misrepresentation or coercion. Having failed to challenge these findings below they are not now cognizable on appeal. (See Henry v. Alcove Investment, Inc. (1991) 233 Cal.App.3d 94, 100-01, 284 Cal.Rptr. 255; Tielsch v. City of Anaheim (1984) 160 Cal.App.3d 570, 574, 206 Cal.Rptr. 738.)

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Try it today free of charge!

The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.

Other Questions

What are the findings of the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of Justice on Beach's appeal against a finding that an autopsy photograph of the victim was unduly prejudicial and lacked probative value? (California, United States of America)

How have courts treated allegations of intentional misrepresentation or deliberate misrepresentation in the context of litigation? (California, United States of America)

How have courts treated evidence that a student was treated radically different than others in a similar situation? (California, United States of America)

How does the Court treat a claim by a defendant that an issue raised and decided in the trial court resulted in constitutional violations? (California, United States of America)

How have the courts treated a husband's out of court declaration to prove his wife's state of mind? (California, United States of America)

When a finding of fact is challenged on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have any power to substitute its conclusions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)

How have the courts treated a defendant's claim that counsel failed to object to the trial court's incorrect belief that he had expressed no remorse at his initial sentencing hearing? (California, United States of America)

What is the test for a de novo review of the findings of the Court of Appeal of a finding that a plaintiff was sexually assaulted during her pregnancy? (California, United States of America)

If a trial court orders testing without articulating its reasons on the record, will the appellate court presume an implied finding of probable cause? (California, United States of America)

How will the Court of Appeal review the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)

How have the courts treated the findings of misrepresentation and coercion?

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Other Questions

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.

Company

Product

Resources