How have the courts treated statements made by appellant in his post-arrest statement?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from The PEOPLE V. DONALD, A121820, No. 146000 (Cal. App. 2010):
On appeal, appellant claims that the court should have excluded his postarrest statements to the police because they were not preceded by a knowing and voluntary waiver of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda). He also
Page 2
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellate court amend an order made by the Superior Court of Justice in a case not before the court? (California, United States of America)
What is the role of the Court of Appeal on an appeal where the superior court has found that the appellant did not have due process or a statement of decision? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated statements made to the police by appellant in two separate interviews? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated appellant's claim that the court deprived him of his constitutional right to due process by ordering him into placement without an adequate case plan? (California, United States of America)
Is an appeal moot when, through no fault of the appellant, an event occurs which makes it impossible for the reviewing court to provide any effective relief to the appellant even when ruling in the appellant's favor? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a motion to suppress statements made by appellant to the police during his detention and interrogation at the police station? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
